Webinar: Implementation of the CPR and DoPCs: Effects on LCA and the EPD International Programme 28 May, 2026
In this webinar, we break down how the EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR) and the introduction of Declarations of Performance and Conformity (DoPCs) impact Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and the International EPD System. We also explore the role of Ecodesign and how PEF connects to EPDs in practice.
Agenda:
Ecodesign:
Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).
Product Environmental Footprint (PEF): single-score overview.
Examples and case studies.
International EPD System:
Overview of the International EPD System.
Aligning EPDs with the CPR: scope and manufacturer obligations.
Understanding DoPCs: required content, harmonised standards, and CE marking Implications for LCA and the International EPD System.
Summary
Part V
1) Are EPDs voluntary or mandatory?
EPDs are not treated as “just voluntary”, they are framed as a strategic asset because EU market access can depend on compliance.
2) When should manufacturers start preparing?
Start early—do not wait until a mandatory reporting deadline, because you will be too late to implement needed processes.
3) What happens if someone doesn’t comply with the EU framework (CPI 2024 referenced)?
Non-compliance can ultimately prevent selling products in the EU market.
4) What is the practical relationship between EPD and DPP (DOPC/DPP wording in the transcript)?
The routine is similar: EPD preparation helps you be prepared for DPP requirements, with some differences.
5) Who controls pricing for developing-country contexts?
Licensees typically set local pricing strategy, you can contact the program/operator for guidance on what is possible.
6) Will the organization publish future DPPs?
No—DPPs are managed by the manufacturer. They may support by providing data in flexible formats to plug into the manufacturer’s DPP.
7) they planning a dedicated DPP solution or standalone system?
No DPP solution is planned as a notified body or as an EPD international system.
8) Is using EcoInvent vs HABI/other databases materially different for required modeling?
Studies mentioned for specific cases (e.g., steel) found differences were marginal overall (often <1%), though some impact categories can vary slightly.
9) Is there a plan for a European background dataset (generic datasets)?
Activity is underway to develop generic datasets and make them available, but it’s not fully resolved/harmonized yet.
10) How does the Netherlands’ approach affect ingredient/environment footprint declarations?
It’s described as “their own thing” and there are concerns about requirements that may affect whether ingredient EPDs are accepted.
11) Do CPR/PCR rules (product category rules) need careful monitoring?
Yes—CPR sets the framework for how products must be declared, including specific assumptions, teams should follow updates closely.
12) Do they support transitioning from current PCRs/CPCRs to harmonized standards?
Yes, already adopting harmonized European standards in their system, aligning as much as possible, while keeping impartiality (with independent/notified-body involvement for transition consulting).
